strafsachen.at
White-collar crime

Corporate criminal liability under the VbVG: representation, service and sanctions

Corporate criminal liability under Austria's VbVG: representation, jurisdiction, service, entity fines, diversion and remedies.

Your personal attorney

Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt

Your lawyer for criminal defence

Criminal proceedings are a matter of trust. One lawyer who walks with you from the first consultation through to the trial, everything from one hand.

9 September 2026, Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt

When an entity is investigated because of an offence by a decision maker or employee, two levels must be kept apart: individual criminal liability and the entity's responsibility under the Austrian Verbandsverantwortlichkeitsgesetz. Three questions are central for the entity: who may represent it, how must documents be served and which sanction may follow?

This article explains sections 1 to 5 and 13 to 24 VbVG with a focus on representation, jurisdiction, service and entity fines. It deals exclusively with proceedings against entities under the VbVG. Drug offences, terrorism, sexual offences, financial offences and private prosecution are outside its scope.

Where does your entity stand?

Assess representation, service or sanctions directly.

Choose the procedural issue that needs to be clarified now. The assessment cannot replace a review of the case file.

You already know that you want to make an enquiry? Go directly to the enquiry form.

01 Question 1

Which issue concerns your entity?

The VbVG has specific rules on jurisdiction, service, representation and sanctions. Choose the issue that needs attention now.

All paths at a glance

Which review matches your situation?

01

Analyse the proceedings against the entity and the natural person separately.

Under section 13 VbVG, the public prosecutor must commence investigations or apply to the court for an entity fine if specific facts suggest that the entity may be responsible for an offence. The entity has the rights of a suspect in the proceedings.

First identify the attributed offence, the persons involved and the alleged benefit or breached duty of the entity. The entity's defence must be distinguished from the individual defence of a natural person.

Responsibility under section 3 VbVG →
02

Check service on the authorised external representative and record time limits.

Section 16 VbVG covers the notice of an investigation, an application for an entity fine, a summons to the first-instance trial and a judgment in absence. These documents must be served on the entity itself into the own hands of a member of the body authorised to represent it externally.

Record the date of receipt, the person receiving the document and the document served. Further time-limit checks start from the relevant service event. Keep the original envelope together with all attachments if service is unclear.

Service and mandatory defence →
03

Protect the entity's representation where the governing body is affected.

If all members of the body authorised to represent the entity externally are suspected of committing the offence, the court must appoint defence counsel for the entity ex officio under section 16(2) VbVG. Counsel must also take the steps required for proper representation of the entity.

Until representation is clarified, the entity's defence should not be treated as identical to the individual defence of a suspect. Under section 17 VbVG, statements may assist the entity's defence and may also be used as evidence against the entity or the individual.

Representation of the entity →
04

Assess the entity fine, its calculation and diversion together.

If the entity is responsible for an offence, section 4 VbVG provides for an entity fine. It is calculated in daily rates. The number of daily rates depends on the penalty applicable to the attributed offence. The amount of each daily rate depends on the entity's earnings and financial capacity.

Section 5 VbVG lists aggravating and mitigating circumstances. Preventive measures taken before the offence, a substantial contribution to establishing the truth, compensation and measures against similar offences may affect the calculation. Diversion under section 19 VbVG should also be examined.

Entity fine and diversion →

When is an entity responsible under the VbVG?

Section 1 VbVG covers legal persons, registered partnerships and European economic interest groupings. The Act applies to offences subject to judicial punishment under federal or state law. Financial offences are included only where the Financial Offences Act provides for this.

Under section 3 VbVG, the offence must have been committed for the benefit of the entity or must have breached duties incumbent on it. For a decision maker, the decision maker must have committed the unlawful and culpable offence in that capacity. For an employee, the offence must also have been enabled or substantially facilitated by a decision maker's failure to exercise the required and reasonable care, especially by omitting essential technical, organisational or personnel measures.

The entity's responsibility and the natural person's criminal liability do not exclude each other. The defence must therefore distinguish facts concerning the individual offence from facts establishing attribution to the entity.

Who represents the entity in criminal proceedings?

The VbVG regulates representation of the entity for the proceedings. A member of the body authorised to represent the entity externally receives service and supports the proper exercise of the entity's procedural rights. Depending on the legal form, this may be a managing director or a board member.

A conflict arises when the authorised representatives themselves are suspected of the attributed offence. If every member of the body is affected, the court must appoint defence counsel for the entity ex officio under section 16(2) VbVG. Counsel must take the steps necessary for proper representation until a representative or chosen defence counsel takes over.

Individual defence and entity defence have different reference points. Under section 17 VbVG, decision makers and employees suspected of the offence or already convicted of it are summoned and questioned as suspects. Before questioning, they must be informed of the offence alleged against the entity and of their right to make a statement or remain silent and to consult defence counsel.

What applies to jurisdiction and service?

Section 15 VbVG generally links jurisdiction to the proceedings against the natural person suspected of the offence. The same public prosecutor and court conduct the proceedings together where the Code of Criminal Procedure permits this. The entity also has the rights of a suspect in the proceedings against the natural person.

For key procedural documents, section 16 VbVG requires service on the entity itself into the own hands of a member of the body authorised to represent it externally. This includes notice of the investigation, an application for an entity fine, the summons to the first-instance trial and a judgment in absence.

For practical time-limit control, preserve three details: the date of attempted or completed service, the person and representative function of the recipient and the complete contents of the envelope. Whether service was effective depends on the statutory requirements and the actual procedure. An email notice alone cannot answer that question.

How is an entity fine calculated?

Section 4 VbVG provides for an entity fine. It is calculated in daily rates. Depending on the penalty applicable to the attributed offence, the statutory maximum number ranges from 40 to 180 daily rates. The amount of one daily rate is based on the entity's earnings and other financial capacity. For profit-making entities, the statutory amount per daily rate ranges from 50 to 30,000 euros. For non-profit, humanitarian or ecclesiastical entities and other entities not pursuing profit, the range is 2 to 1,500 euros.

Section 5 VbVG requires aggravating and mitigating circumstances to be balanced. Greater harm or danger, a greater benefit obtained and tolerated or encouraged unlawful conduct may increase the number. Measures taken before the offence, a substantial contribution to establishing the truth, compensation and effective steps against similar offences may be mitigating factors.

Financial records are therefore part of the defence. Relevant material may include current financial statements, a comprehensible presentation of earnings and evidence of the consequences of the offence. The daily rate cannot be reduced to a fixed percentage of turnover.

Which alternatives and remedies are available?

Section 19 VbVG permits withdrawal from prosecution under the conditions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Depending on the form, this may involve payment of an amount of up to 50 daily rates, a probation period of up to three years or community service within a specified period. The entity must in particular compensate the harm caused by the offence and remedy other consequences where the chosen resolution requires this.

If the matter reaches trial, section 22 VbVG regulates the relationship between the proceedings against the natural person and the entity. In a joint proceeding, the court first hears and decides the case against the natural person. It then addresses the requirements for entity responsibility and the circumstances relevant to the fine.

Under section 24 VbVG, the remedies available under the Code of Criminal Procedure against judgments are also available against a judgment concerning the entity, including in separate proceedings. The required step and deadline depend on the judgment, the court and the specific remedy. Record the service date of the judgment immediately.

Clarify representation early. Service on the entity and defence of a suspected natural person are separate matters. Check authority to represent, possible conflicts and the service date together with the complete document.

Which documents should the entity secure?

For an initial legal review, keep the notice of investigation or application for an entity fine, proof of service, powers of attorney and current corporate documents together. Also preserve the material showing the alleged offence, the benefit to the entity or the duty said to have been breached.

For attribution, the allocation of responsibilities, control and approval processes, documented training and reports are relevant. A policy created after the event does not by itself show which reasonable measures existed before the offence.

The sanction review also requires financial records, information on compensation and evidence of improvement measures. Preserve documents unchanged and record their date of receipt and origin. For the applicable statutory text, consult the current VbVG version in RIS.

Frequently asked questions

What applies in VbVG proceedings against an entity?

What is an entity under the VbVG? +

The VbVG covers legal persons, registered partnerships and European economic interest groupings. Estates and certain state or religious activities are excluded under section 1(3) VbVG.

Can an entity be prosecuted alongside an employee? +

Yes. Under section 3(4) VbVG, the entity's responsibility and the criminal liability of a decision maker or employee do not exclude each other. The two levels must be assessed separately.

Who may receive service under the VbVG? +

The key documents named in section 16 VbVG must be served on the entity itself into the own hands of a member of the body authorised to represent it externally. Record the service date and the recipient's function.

What happens if all authorised representatives are suspects? +

If every member of the authorised body is suspected, the court must appoint defence counsel for the entity ex officio under section 16(2) VbVG. Counsel takes the necessary steps for proper entity representation.

How high can an entity fine be? +

The entity fine is imposed in daily rates. Section 4 VbVG sets the number by reference to the penalty applicable to the attributed offence. The amount of each daily rate depends on earnings and financial capacity and is subject to statutory minimums and maximums.

Is diversion available to an entity? +

Section 19 VbVG permits withdrawal from prosecution under the statutory conditions. Depending on the form, this may involve a payment, a probation period or community service. Compensation and the remedying of consequences require particular attention.

Topics
VbVGcorporate criminal liabilityentity representationserviceentity finediversion

Interview, house search, indictment?

In criminal matters every hour counts. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day, earlier in urgent cases.

Contact

A direct line to the firm.

Address

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg