strafsachen.at
by Brandauer RA
Appeals

Diversion in Austria: how criminal proceedings can end without a conviction

Diversion under Sections 198 ff StPO: fine, community service, probation and mediation. When criminal proceedings end without a conviction and without a criminal-record entry.

Your personal attorney

Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt

Your lawyer for criminal defence

Criminal proceedings are a matter of trust. One lawyer who walks with you from the first consultation through to the trial, everything from one hand.

6 June 2026 · Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt

After a complaint, the most important question for many accused arises not at trial but immediately: can the proceedings be ended without a conviction and an entry in the criminal record at the end? This is exactly what Austrian criminal law provides for through diversion. It is not a free pass, but for many people accused for the first time or of a non-serious offence it is the most realistic and the best outcome.

This article explains, from a legal perspective, when diversion under Sections 198 ff StPO is possible, which four forms exist, what they actually cost and mean and why diversion entails neither a finding of guilt nor an entry in the criminal record. It deals with diversion for adults; in juvenile criminal law additional special rules apply. This is general information, not advice in an individual case.

Is diversion an option for you?

Four starting situations, one clear next step.

Whether diversion is possible depends on severity, damage and the stage of the proceedings. Choose the situation that applies to you to see a first assessment and the next concrete step.

You already know you want to send a request? Go straight to the form.

01 Question 1

What is your situation?

Whether and when diversion is possible depends on severity and the stage of the proceedings. Choose the situation that applies to you to see a first assessment and the next concrete step.

All paths at a glance

Overview of all answers.

01

First allegation: have it assessed whether the case is eligible for diversion.

For a first, non-serious allegation, diversion under Sections 198 ff StPO is often the most important lever. It requires that the facts are sufficiently clarified, that the guilt is not to be regarded as serious, that no punishment appears necessary to deter the accused or others from further offences and that the act did not cause a person’s death. In addition, the offence must not be punishable by more than five years’ imprisonment. From a legal perspective, the task now is to clarify the evidence and degree of guilt through file access under Section 51 StPO and to offer the prosecution a diversionary outcome.

The decision is made by the prosecution, and in the main proceedings also by the court. A well-prepared proposal with acceptance of responsibility and, where possible, compensation of the damage clearly improves the prospects.

More on the requirements and exclusions →
02

Financial damage: compensation can open diversion or active repentance.

Where financial damage is at stake, two routes complement each other. First, diversion under Sections 198 ff StPO, for example through a fine or community service, often combined with making good the damage. Second, active repentance under Section 167 StGB: anyone who makes good the entire damage before the authority learns of their fault can, for property offences, even remain unpunished. From a legal perspective, the timing is decisive, because active repentance only takes effect with timely and complete compensation.

Which route fits depends on the offence, the amount of damage and the stage of the proceedings. These points are set during the investigation, not only at the main hearing.

More on the four forms of diversion →
03

Conflict with an injured person: assess out-of-court victim-offender mediation.

After an altercation with an injured person, out-of-court victim-offender mediation under Section 204 StPO comes into consideration. Accompanied by a conflict mediator, a settlement is worked out covering the accused’s responsibility, an apology and, where applicable, compensation. If the mediation succeeds, the proceedings can end without a finding of guilt. From a legal perspective, it is important to prepare the mediation and not to give up your own position in the process.

Mediation is a proven route, especially for bodily harm or property damage, balancing the interests of both sides and avoiding an entry in the criminal record.

More on the four forms of diversion →
04

Diversion offer received: check the conditions and consequences before consenting.

If a diversion offer is already on the table, you should examine the conditions and consequences closely before consenting. Diversion means no finding of guilt and no entry in the criminal record, but it is tied to conditions, for example a fine, community service, a probationary period or mediation. From a legal perspective, the question is whether diversion is really the better route compared with a discontinuation of the proceedings (Section 190 StPO) or an acquittal, and whether the conditions are proportionate.

Accepting diversion is voluntary. You do not waive your rights by doing so, but you should make the decision informed and not under time pressure.

More on guilt, the criminal record and costs →

What diversion means

Diversion means ending criminal proceedings without a formal conviction. Instead of a verdict, the prosecution or the court provisionally refrains from prosecution if the accused fulfils a condition, for example paying a fine, performing community service, passing a probationary period or carrying out victim-offender mediation. Once the condition is fulfilled, the proceedings are finally discontinued.

The decisive advantage: diversion is not a finding of guilt. It does not appear in the criminal record and does not count as a previous conviction. For many accused that matters more than the distant prospect of an acquittal after a long and burdensome trial.

Diversion is not the same as a discontinuation under Section 190 StPO. Discontinuation occurs where the suspicion is insufficient or no criminal conduct exists, so it is the "better" outcome without any condition. Diversion, by contrast, presupposes that sufficient suspicion exists but that the guilt is not serious.

Requirements and exclusions

The general requirements follow from Section 198 StPO. Diversion is possible where four conditions are met.

The facts are sufficiently clarified. It must be established what happened; where the evidence is disputed, diversion is generally not the first route, clarifying the allegation is.

The guilt is not serious. What counts is the weight of wrong and guilt in the individual case, not the amount of damage alone. Depending on the act and the circumstances, even a higher amount of damage can still be eligible for diversion.

No punishment necessary. No punishment may be necessary to deter the accused or others from further offences. Here a clean record, insight and compensation matter.

No fatal outcome and a penalty up to five years. The act must as a rule not have caused a person’s death and must not be punishable by more than five years’ imprisonment. This excludes the most serious crimes, which fall within the jurisdiction of the lay-judge or jury court.

The four forms of diversion

The law provides for four diversionary measures, used individually or in combination.

Fine (Section 200 StPO). A payment of up to 180 daily rates, the amount of which depends on the financial circumstances, plus a flat contribution to costs. The fine is the most common form for minor property and traffic offences.

Community service (Section 201 StPO). Unpaid work for the common good, for adults up to 240 hours, at most eight hours per day and forty hours per week, to be performed within six months. An alternative for accused who cannot pay a fine.

Probationary period (Section 203 StPO). A probationary term of one to two years, often combined with obligations or with probation assistance. If the accused stays out of trouble, the proceedings are discontinued.

Out-of-court victim-offender mediation (Section 204 StPO). An accompanied settlement between accused and victim covering acceptance of responsibility, a discussion and compensation. Particularly suitable for bodily harm, property damage and conflicts in the personal sphere.

Guilt, the criminal record and costs

No finding of guilt. Diversion contains no verdict of guilt. The accused need not formally confess, but a degree of accepting responsibility is regularly the basis, especially in mediation.

No criminal-record entry. A diversionary outcome does not appear in the criminal record and is not a previous conviction. It is only recorded internally, which can matter, for instance, for the question of a fresh diversion in the event of a later offence.

Costs. Besides any fine, a flat contribution to costs is payable. The overall burden is as a rule clearly lower than the consequences of a conviction, especially when one considers the indirect effects of a previous conviction on profession, trade and residence.

Voluntariness. Accepting diversion is voluntary. If the accused declines, the proceedings continue. This decision should be made informed and after file access, not under time pressure.

Diversion is not automatic. No one has an enforceable right to diversion. The prosecution decides on it, and in the main proceedings the court. A well-prepared proposal with file access, acceptance of responsibility and, where possible, compensation clearly improves the prospects. How the proceedings work overall is set out in our article What to do after a criminal complaint in Austria.

Frequently asked questions

What you need to know about diversion in Austria.

Is diversion a previous conviction? +

No. Diversion is not a finding of guilt and does not appear in the criminal record. It does not count as a previous conviction and need not be stated on a criminal-record certificate. It is only noted internally, which can become relevant for a fresh diversion in the event of a later offence.

Do I have to confess for diversion? +

A formal confession is not mandatory. The requirement is that the facts are sufficiently clarified and that the accused is willing to accept responsibility. In mediation in particular, a discussion with the victim is part of the process. From a legal perspective, it is important that such steps are taken only after file access and with a clear strategy.

For which offences is diversion excluded? +

Diversion is excluded where the guilt is serious, where punishment appears necessary to deter further offences, where the act caused a person’s death or where it is punishable by more than five years’ imprisonment. This rules out the most serious crimes. In many cases of minor and moderate crime, by contrast, diversion remains possible.

Who decides on diversion? +

During the investigation the prosecution decides whether to proceed by diversion. If a charge has already been filed, the court too can deal with the matter by diversion. There is no enforceable right, but a well-founded proposal with knowledge of the file and an offer of compensation can decisively influence the decision.

What is the difference between diversion and discontinuation? +

Discontinuation under Section 190 StPO occurs where the suspicion is insufficient or no criminal conduct exists, it is the better outcome with no condition at all. Diversion presupposes sufficient suspicion but avoids the conviction through fulfilling a condition. Which route is achievable and sensible in the individual case is clarified by file access.

Can I combine active repentance and diversion? +

The two routes do not exclude each other. Active repentance under Section 167 StGB can even lead to impunity for property offences if the entire damage is made good in good time and in full before the authority learns of the fault. If active repentance does not fully apply, diversion remains the next step. The right sequence and documentation of payments is decisive here.

Topics
diversioncriminal-proceedingsfinemediationcriminal-recordactive-repentance

Interview, house search, indictment?

In criminal matters every hour counts. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day, earlier in urgent cases.

Contact

A direct line to the firm.

Address

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg