strafsachen.at
Appeals

False accusation under Section 297 StGB: when a false report becomes a criminal offence

False accusation under Section 297 StGB: knowingly accusing another of an ex-officio offence, knowledge as the core requirement and the distinction from Section 298 StGB.

Your personal attorney

Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt

Your lawyer for criminal defence

Criminal proceedings are a matter of trust. One lawyer who walks with you from the first consultation through to the trial, everything from one hand.

21 June 2026 · Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt

A false report can leave deep marks. Whoever is wrongly accused of a criminal offence suddenly faces an investigation although they did nothing. Conversely, people who are themselves considering a report wonder from what point an unjustified report becomes a risk for them. At the centre stands the offence of false accusation.

This article explains from a legal perspective when a false accusation is punishable under Section 297 StGB, what role knowledge plays, why false accusation as an ex-officio offence protects the administration of justice and how it differs from feigning a criminal offence under Section 298 StGB. This is general information, not advice on an individual case.

Which situation fits?

Four constellations, the right first step for each.

Whether you were wrongly accused or are considering a report yourself determines the approach. Choose the situation that applies to you and receive the key assessment and the next step.

You already know you want to send a request? Go straight to the form.

01 Question 1

Which situation around a false accusation concerns you?

Whether you were wrongly accused or are considering filing a report yourself determines the right approach. Choose the situation closest to yours.

All paths at a glance

Overview of all answers.

01

You were wrongly accused: examine false accusation under Section 297 StGB.

Whoever knowingly falsely accuses another person of an offence prosecuted ex officio and thereby exposes them to the risk of official prosecution may fulfil the offence of false accusation under Section 297 StGB. Unlike the honour offences, false accusation is an ex-officio offence prosecuted by the authorities.

From a legal perspective, clean documentation matters: what was alleged, to whom, and did the reporting person know that the allegation was false? These questions shape the legal assessment.

In depth: the offence of false accusation →
02

You are considering a report: know the line between a legitimate report and false accusation.

A report is generally permitted and even desirable where there is a reasonable suspicion. It only becomes punishable where someone knowingly accuses another person falsely. Whoever raises a suspicion in good faith commits no false accusation, even if the suspicion is not later confirmed.

From a legal perspective, the decisive line is knowledge. Anyone who is unsure should examine the facts carefully and rely on traceable indications instead of accusing at random.

In depth: legitimate report or false accusation →
03

You are accused of false accusation: examine knowledge and defence.

If an investigation is running against you for false accusation, the central question is whether you knew that the allegation raised was false. False accusation requires knowledge. Whoever filed a report in good faith or on the basis of traceable indications does not fulfil the offence.

From a legal perspective, early preparation of the basis on which the report rested is important. Which indications existed and how they came about is of considerable significance for the defence.

In depth: defence against false accusation →
04

Feigned offence without a concrete accusation: distinction from Section 298 StGB.

Whoever feigns the commission of a criminal offence to an authority and thereby induces it to take official action, without concretely accusing anyone, does not fall under false accusation but under feigning a criminal offence (Section 298 StGB). The difference lies in whether a particular person is accused or not.

From a legal perspective, the precise classification is decisive because it determines the applicable offence. Both offences protect the administration of justice from abusive recourse.

In depth: distinction from Section 298 StGB →

The offence of false accusation under Section 297 StGB

False accusation under Section 297 StGB covers whoever exposes another person to the risk of official prosecution by falsely accusing them of an offence prosecuted ex officio or of a breach of an official or professional duty. The protected interest is not primarily honour, but the administration of justice, which is to be preserved from abusive recourse.

A central feature is that the accused conduct is to be prosecuted ex officio and that the affected person is exposed to the risk of official prosecution through the accusation. A merely disparaging allegation towards third parties without this official link falls rather within the scope of the honour offences.

From a legal perspective, careful examination of whether all elements are present is important. In particular the question to which body the accusation was made and what consequences it triggered is significant.

Knowledge as the core requirement

False accusation requires that the perpetrator knows the accusation is false. This knowledge is the decisive distinguishing feature. Whoever files a report in good faith or on the basis of traceable indications does not commit false accusation, even if the suspicion is not later confirmed.

In this way the law protects the legitimate report. Criminal prosecution depends on people reporting grounds for suspicion. Only the deliberately false accusation crosses the line into punishability.

From a legal perspective, knowledge is often the central point of dispute. For both the wrongly accused and the reporting person, what matters is which knowledge can be demonstrated at the time of the report.

Penalty range and severity

False accusation is punishable by a custodial sentence. The law provides for an increased penalty range where the falsely imputed conduct is itself threatened with a higher penalty. The more serious the false allegation, the stricter the penalty range for the false accusation.

In this way the law expresses that a false accusation concerning a serious offence particularly endangers the affected person and burdens the administration of justice to a particular degree.

From a legal perspective, the classification of the imputed conduct is therefore also significant for the possible penalty. It influences the range within which a penalty may move.

Distinction

False accusation or honour offence?

Both areas concern false or disparaging allegations, but protect different legal interests and are prosecuted differently.

Comparison of false accusation and honour offences
Feature False accusation (Section 297) Honour offence (Sections 111, 115)
Protected interest Administration of justice Honour
Content of the allegation False accusation of a criminal offence Disparaging fact or abuse
Mental element Knowledge required Intent, no knowledge requirement
Prosecution Ex-officio offence Generally private prosecution

A deliberately false report can turn against the person reporting. Whoever knowingly falsely accuses another person of a criminal offence risks criminal proceedings of their own for false accusation under Section 297 StGB. The legitimate report made in good faith remains unaffected. What is decisive is the knowledge of the false accusation.

Distinction from feigning an offence under Section 298 StGB

To be distinguished from false accusation is feigning a criminal offence under Section 298 StGB. It concerns the case where someone feigns the commission of a criminal offence to an authority and thereby induces it to take official action, without accusing a particular person.

The difference therefore lies in the concrete accusation. Where a particular person is falsely accused, false accusation comes into consideration. Where merely an offence is feigned without accusing anyone, feigning an offence under Section 298 StGB applies.

From a legal perspective, the clean assignment is decisive because it determines the applicable offence and the further handling. Both offences protect the administration of justice from abusive recourse.

Legitimate report or false accusation

A report is a legitimate means of bringing a suspicion to the competent body. Whoever raises a suspicion in good faith need not fear being called to account for it, even if the suspicion is not ultimately substantiated. The line to false accusation is only crossed where someone knowingly accuses falsely.

From a legal perspective, it is advisable to base a report on traceable indications and to allege only what can be supported. In this way the legitimate pursuit of one’s own interests remains clearly separated from the punishable false accusation.

Defence against false accusation

Where an investigation is running against someone for false accusation, the question of knowledge stands at the centre. Could the reporting person assume that their allegation was correct, or did they know that it was false? On this question everything turns.

From a legal perspective, it is important to prepare the basis of the report early and in full. Which indications existed, how they came about and how the suspicion developed shapes the defence. A careful presentation can make the difference between a legitimate report and the charge of a false accusation.

Frequent questions

What applies to false accusation.

When is a false report punishable? +

Punishable as false accusation under Section 297 StGB is whoever knowingly falsely accuses another person of an offence prosecuted ex officio and thereby exposes them to the risk of official prosecution. What is decisive is knowledge: whoever reports in good faith or on the basis of traceable indications does not commit false accusation, even if the suspicion is not later confirmed.

What distinguishes false accusation from insult? +

False accusation under Section 297 StGB protects the administration of justice and is an ex-officio offence requiring the knowingly false accusation of a criminal offence. The honour offences under Sections 111, 115 StGB protect honour and are generally prosecuted only by way of a private prosecution. False accusation attaches to the risk of official prosecution, the honour offences to disparagement in public opinion.

What is the difference from Section 298 StGB? +

Feigning a criminal offence under Section 298 StGB concerns the case where someone feigns the commission of an offence to an authority without accusing a particular person. Where, by contrast, a particular person is falsely accused, false accusation under Section 297 StGB comes into consideration. The difference lies in the concrete accusation of a person.

Am I punishable if my suspicion is not confirmed? +

Not for that reason alone. A report in good faith or on the basis of traceable indications is not false accusation, even if the suspicion is ultimately not substantiated. It only becomes punishable where someone knowingly accuses falsely. It is sensible to base a report on demonstrable indications.

Topics
false-accusationwrongful-accusationadministration-of-justiceex-officio-offencestgb-297stgb-298

Interview, house search, indictment?

In criminal matters every hour counts. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day, earlier in urgent cases.

Contact

A direct line to the firm.

Address

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg