Accused person: clarify the allegation and file first.
Do not give a spontaneous explanation before the object, alleged conduct and evidence are known. From a lawyer’s perspective, defence starts with file access and a structured chronology.
Property crimes
Forgery of protected documents under section 224 StGB
Section 224 StGB: protected documents, identity papers, public documents and distinction from section 223 StGB.
Your personal attorney
Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
Your lawyer for criminal defence
Criminal proceedings are a matter of trust. One lawyer who walks with you from the first consultation through to the trial, everything from one hand.
12 August 2026 · Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
Section 224 StGB changes the assessment where not just any document but a specially protected document is involved. This can matter for public documents, identity papers and comparable records.
This article explains from a lawyer’s perspective how section 224 StGB differs from basic document forgery, which documents are reviewed in proceedings and which first steps are useful.
Stay informed. New notes from the Brandauer network and current articles are available at brandauer-news.at.
Quick assessment
Which question should be clarified first?
The first reaction depends on the precise allegation.
Already know that you want to send an inquiry? Go directly to the inquiry form.
Which situation fits best?
For section 224 StGB, object, access, authority and intent must be separated.
All paths at a glance
Overview of all answers.
Prepare file access →
Affected person: secure evidence and define the aim.
Secure documents, messages and witnesses. Then assess whether a complaint, surrender request or another procedural step is useful.
Evidence: keep the original context.
Messages, devices, cards, documents or vehicles should not be changed. The original context may later be decisive.
Context: separate authority and role.
In family, business or shared access situations, much depends on who was authorised to do what and what the person knew.
Elements and qualification to section 224 StGB
Elements and qualification to section 224 StGB
Section 224 StGB builds on document forgery but concerns specially protected documents. The review must therefore go beyond the allegation of a false document.
The decisive question is which document is involved and why it enjoys special protection. Public documents, identity papers and certain foreign documents must be identified precisely.
From a lawyer’s perspective, first review whether the basic elements of document forgery are met and whether the qualification is properly reasoned.
Evidence: original, copy, issuer and use
Evidence: original, copy, issuer and use
Important evidence includes the original document, copies, issuer data, scanning or printing traces, handovers, chat messages and the concrete purpose of use.
With identity papers or certificates, it is often unclear whether forgery, alteration, use or mere possession is alleged. These variants must be separated.
Accused persons should not rush to explain where a document came from. Origin and use must be assessed against the file.
Distinction from section 223, section 224a and document suppression
Distinction from section 223, section 224a and document suppression
Section 223 StGB is the basic offence. Section 224 StGB concerns specially protected documents. Section 224a StGB may concern other acts involving false protected documents.
Suppressing documents under section 229 StGB is different. It concerns a genuine document removed from evidentiary use.
For passports, driving licences or certificates, exact classification is important because several allegations may be raised together.
First steps in a document allegation
First steps in a document allegation
Accused persons should know the concrete document, alleged issuer and alleged use before giving explanations.
Affected persons or companies should preserve document routes, checks and communication traces. Any technical review should be documented and not speculative.
From a lawyer’s perspective, the document chain is often more important than a visual impression.
Overview
Reviewing section 224 StGB precisely
Special protection, authenticity and use must be separated.
| Point | Meaning | First question |
|---|---|---|
| Document | Identity paper or public document | What exactly is involved? |
| Protection | Special document quality | Why is section 224 invoked? |
| Act | Making, altering or using | What is alleged? |
| Origin | Issuer and handover | How did the document reach the person? |
Important: Do not give a spontaneous origin explanation. In document allegations, original, issuer, use and communication traces are decisive.
Frequently asked questions
section 224 StGB: key questions.
What is a specially protected document? +
That depends on the type, issuer and legal function of the document. Public documents and identity papers may fall within it.
Is section 224 StGB the same as section 223 StGB? +
No. Section 223 StGB is the basic offence. Section 224 StGB concerns specially protected documents and needs its own assessment.
What should I do first in a document allegation? +
Have file access, document chain, origin and alleged use reviewed before giving an explanation.
Related topics
You may also be interested in
Topics
section 224 StGBdocument forgeryidentity documentpublic documentdocumentcriminal proceedings
Interview, house search, indictment?
In criminal matters every hour counts. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day, earlier in urgent cases.
Contact
A direct line to the firm.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 660 2407152