Accused person: clarify the allegation and file first.
Do not give a spontaneous explanation before the object, alleged conduct and evidence are known. From a lawyer’s perspective, defence starts with file access and a structured chronology.
Section 170 StGB: negligent conflagration after a fire in home, business, site or workshop. First steps and evidence.
Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
Your lawyer for criminal defence
Criminal proceedings are a matter of trust. One lawyer who walks with you from the first consultation through to the trial, everything from one hand.
After a fire in a home, business, workshop, hotel or construction site, the question quickly arises whether carelessness is criminally relevant. Section 170 StGB concerns negligent causing of a conflagration.
This article explains from a lawyer’s perspective when section 170 StGB must be reviewed, how it differs from intentional arson and negligence offences involving injuries, and which evidence matters immediately after the event.
Stay informed. New notes from the Brandauer network and current articles are available at brandauer-news.at.
The first reaction depends on the precise allegation.
Already know that you want to send an inquiry? Go directly to the inquiry form.
For section 170 StGB, fire event, duty of care, cause and consequences must be separated.
Do not give a spontaneous explanation before the object, alleged conduct and evidence are known. From a lawyer’s perspective, defence starts with file access and a structured chronology.
Secure documents, messages and witnesses. Then assess whether a complaint, surrender request, seizure application or another procedural step is useful.
After a fire, cause, duties of care, maintenance, instructions and witnesses are decisive. Photos, emergency reports and technical records should be preserved.
If an appointment, seizure or escalation is imminent, first preserve the current position. Then decide whether a statement, application or contact with the authority is useful.
Section 170 StGB applies when a conflagration is caused negligently. The focus is not a minor isolated damage, but a fire event with corresponding danger quality.
Practical settings include heaters, electrical work, construction work, candles, storage of flammable materials, kitchen areas or lack of supervision. Negligence depends on the specific duty of care.
From a lawyer’s perspective, cause of fire, duty situation, foreseeability and avoidability must be separated early.
Intentional arson under section 169 StGB is a different allegation. Section 170 StGB is the negligence case. If people were injured, negligent bodily injury, negligent homicide or endangerment of physical safety may also be reviewed.
This distinction matters because defence focuses differently. Under section 170 StGB, duty of care, foreseeability and technical cause are central.
Related background is available on arson, negligent bodily injury and endangerment of physical safety.
Important evidence includes emergency reports, photos, videos, maintenance records, manuals, site logs, shift plans, safety instructions and statements by first responders or neighbours.
Accused persons should not remove items or change technical installations before they are documented. Affected persons should quickly record location, smell, sounds, time and perceptions.
In businesses and construction sites, clarify who was responsible for supervision, maintenance and release. Organisational responsibility does not automatically mean personal criminal liability.
After a fire, first preserve the facts. Photos, witness names, emergency reports and technical records matter. Then assess which statements to police, insurer or authority are useful.
Anyone accused should not spontaneously accept fault. The technical cause is often unclear, and first impressions do not necessarily prove criminal negligence.
From a lawyer’s perspective, a traceable chronology matters: what was used, checked, switched off or supervised and when. That chronology is the basis for further assessment.
Quick assessment
| Point | Meaning | First question |
|---|---|---|
| Fire event | conflagration with danger quality | What exactly happened? |
| Duty of care | specific personal duty | What should have been done? |
| Cause | technical or human contribution | What triggered the fire? |
| Consequences | damage and danger | Who or what was affected? |
Important: Do not alter technical traces after a fire. First preserve photos, emergency report, maintenance records and witnesses.
It means a fire event allegedly caused negligently through breach of a duty of care.
No. Fire quality, cause, concrete duty of care, foreseeability and avoidability are decisive.
Photos, emergency reports, technical records, maintenance documents, witnesses and a precise chronology should be organised.
In criminal matters every hour counts. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day, earlier in urgent cases.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 660 2407152