Burglary theft under section 129 StGB: difference from theft, breaking in, entering, keys, evidence and defence steps.
Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
Your lawyer for criminal defence
Criminal proceedings are a matter of trust. One lawyer who walks with you from the first consultation through to the trial, everything from one hand.
Burglary theft is legally more than ordinary theft. Section 129 StGB attaches to specific modes of conduct, such as breaking in, entering or using unlawfully obtained keys, and can significantly change the penalty risk.
This article explains when an allegation under section 129 StGB arises, how homes, businesses, hotel rooms and containers are assessed and which evidence matters in the first procedural steps.
Section 129 StGB depends heavily on the mode of conduct. Breaking in, entering, keys and place change the legal assessment.
Already know you want to send an enquiry? Go straight to the contact form.
The first assessment depends on the allegation, the file status and upcoming procedural steps.
At the beginning, no spontaneous explanation should be given. The exact allegation, competence, evidence and procedural status must be clarified first.
From a legal perspective, file access is the basis of any further decision.
Photos, messages, expert material, records and witness leads should be preserved in an organised way. Nothing should be deleted, changed or created afterwards.
Early documentation often decides whether an exculpatory alternative remains traceable later.
Before making a statement, it must be clear what is in the file and which points incriminate or exculpate. Silence, partial information and a written statement are different tools.
Which option fits depends on the concrete allegation.
Before a hearing, evidence applications, exculpatory documents, possible restitution and the procedural goal should be clarified.
Those who start structuring only at the hearing often lose important options.
The basis remains theft under section 127 StGB. A qualifying circumstance must be added, such as breaking in, entering, opening a container or using an unlawfully obtained key.
The defence therefore examines not only whether an item was taken, but also whether the alleged mode of conduct can actually be proved.
The assessment depends strongly on the precise place and possession situation. A home, business premises, storage room, hotel room or locked container can raise different evidence issues.
It matters whether there really was breaking or entering, whether a key was used lawfully and whether technical traces support the prosecution version.
Typical evidence includes video recordings, fingerprints, tool marks, chats, location data, witnesses and the question who allegedly made which contribution.
Where several persons are involved, precise role clarification decides whether perpetration, assistance or mere presence is alleged.
After arrest or summons, no spontaneous explanation should be given. File access, preservation of exculpatory documents and assessment of restitution or active repentance come first.
Contact with injured parties or witnesses should not be uncoordinated because it can create new allegations or evidence problems.
The difference lies not only in value, but mainly in the mode of conduct.
| Constellation | Issue | Norm |
|---|---|---|
| Taking without qualification | Possession breach and intent | Section 127 StGB |
| Breaking in or entering | Qualified mode of conduct | Section 129 StGB |
| Unlawfully obtained key | Authority and origin must be checked | Section 129 StGB |
| Restitution | Extinction or mitigation must be assessed | Section 167 StGB |
In section 129 StGB cases, traces and roles must be secured quickly.
Check breaking, entering or keys precisely.
Assess video, traces and statements from the file first.
Distinguish own contribution from others.
Classify return or payment tactically.
The mode of conduct is key. In section 129 StGB cases, the value of the item is often less decisive than whether the qualifying mode can actually be proved.
Yes, if the elements of section 129 StGB are met, the allegation is classified more seriously. The mode of conduct and evidence therefore require careful review.
The assessment depends on the concrete possession situation and the mode of conduct. The relevant questions are which room was affected and how access occurred.
It can matter, but should not be uncoordinated. Active repentance, diversion and effects on defence strategy must be assessed.
The basic offence and its elements.
Where damage is alleged in addition to taking.
Dealing with items already obtained through an offence.
When restitution can extinguish liability.
In criminal matters every hour counts. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day, earlier in urgent cases.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 660 2407152