New suspicion: clarify file access and role first.
At the beginning, do not explain spontaneously. The exact allegation should be clarified first. File access, competence and evidence are the basis of any further decision.
Official offences
Corruption in public office: bribery, acceptance of benefits and gifts under Austrian law
Corruption in public office in Austria: how sections 304 to 309 StGB distinguish bribery, acceptance of benefits, gifts and first defence steps.
Your personal attorney
Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
Your lawyer for criminal defence
Criminal proceedings are a matter of trust. One lawyer who walks with you from the first consultation through to the trial, everything from one hand.
7 July 2026 · Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
A corruption allegation in public office rarely concerns one isolated act. It often involves invitations, gifts, favours, administrative decisions and the question whether a benefit was linked to official action. For the accused, the first task is to separate bribery, acceptance of benefits, gifts and merely imprudent conduct.
This article explains sections 304 to 309 StGB from a legal perspective. It is deliberately distinct from the general abuse of office offence and focuses on the first procedural assessment when a concrete allegation arises.
Quick assessment
Which starting point fits your proceedings?
Choose the situation closest to yours. You will receive an initial orientation and the next practical step.
Already know you want to send an enquiry? Go straight to the contact form.
Which situation is at stake?
The first assessment depends on whether there is already a complaint, summons, concrete evidence or upcoming hearing.
All paths at a glance
Overview of all answers.
Attend questioning prepared.
Before making a statement, clarify your role, the evidence and whether silence, partial information or a prepared statement is appropriate.
Examine evidence fully and in context.
Individual messages, records or statements can mislead. The timeline, full context and possible exculpatory material matter.
Prepare the hearing actively.
Before the main hearing, evidence applications, mitigating factors, documents and the statement decision should be clarified.
Distinction
Which corruption offence is in focus?
| Provision | Überblick | Practical question |
|---|---|---|
| Section 304 StGB | Bribery involving a breach of duty | Was a benefit linked to unlawful official action? |
| Section 305 StGB | Acceptance of a benefit in connection with office | Was the benefit linked to official duties? |
| Section 306 StGB | Preparation of acceptance of a benefit | Was the benefit aimed at the official position? |
| Section 309 StGB | Gifts or bribery in the private sphere | Does the case concern employees or agents outside classic public authority? |
Public official, benefit and official act
Public official, benefit and official act
The first question is whether the criminal law concept of a public official or comparable official function is engaged. Austrian criminal law uses a broader concept than everyday language.
A benefit can be money, but also an invitation, a service, a discount or another advantage. Not every benefit is criminal. Purpose, timing, official connection, value, transparency and any link to a concrete official act are decisive.
Bribery and acceptance of benefits
Bribery and acceptance of benefits
Section 304 StGB concerns bribery on the official side. The allegation is that a benefit was demanded, accepted or promised for an unlawful official act.
Section 305 StGB concerns acceptance of benefits. It does not necessarily require an unlawful decision. From a legal perspective, the crucial question is whether the case concerns a concrete unlawful act, general relationship management or socially usual conduct without criminal relevance.
Evidence, messages and official files
Evidence, messages and official files
Corruption proceedings often rely on emails, calendars, procurement notes, phone records, chat messages and witness statements from the same professional environment. Individual phrases can look harsher in hindsight than they were meant.
The defence therefore has to reconstruct context: who had which authority, who knew about which benefit and when, and whether internal approvals or compliance rules existed.
Distinction from abuse of office
Distinction from abuse of office
A corruption allegation is not the same as abuse of office. Abuse of office asks whether an official knowingly misused authority with intent to harm rights. Corruption offences focus on benefits and their connection with official duties.
Both allegations can be examined in parallel. Still, each offence has its own elements. A wrong decision does not prove bribery, and a benefit can matter even where the decision later appears formally defensible.
Separate the issues early. In corruption proceedings, distinguish gift, socially usual courtesy, compliance uncertainty and criminally relevant acceptance of benefits. That distinction shapes file review, statement strategy and possible disposal.
Frequently asked questions
What you need to know about corruption allegations.
Is every gift to a public official criminal? +
No. Value, occasion, official connection, transparency and any influence on official conduct are decisive. These circumstances need individual assessment.
What is the difference between bribery and acceptance of benefits? +
Section 304 StGB is linked to unlawful official conduct. Section 305 StGB can concern benefits connected with official duties more generally. The distinction is often central to the defence.
Should I comment on chat messages immediately? +
Not without file access and context. Messages can be misleading in isolation. From a legal perspective the evidence should be examined before any statement is made.
Related topics
You might also be interested in
Topics
corruptionbriberypublic officeacceptance of benefitsAustriaStGB
Interview, house search, indictment?
In criminal matters every hour counts. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day, earlier in urgent cases.
Contact
A direct line to the firm.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 660 2407152