Accused person: clarify the allegation and file first.
Do not give a spontaneous explanation before the object, alleged conduct and evidence are known. From a lawyer’s perspective, defence starts with file access and a structured chronology.
White-collar crime
Frustrating enforcement under section 162 StGB in execution or insolvency
Section 162 StGB: moving, hiding or reducing assets against creditor access in execution or insolvency. First steps.
Your personal attorney
Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
Your lawyer for criminal defence
Criminal proceedings are a matter of trust. One lawyer who walks with you from the first consultation through to the trial, everything from one hand.
21 August 2026 · Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
If assets are moved, sold or apparently reduced during execution or insolvency, section 162 StGB can become relevant. The allegation is not merely poor business judgment, but targeted obstruction of creditor access.
This article explains from a lawyer’s perspective which questions must be clarified first, how section 162 differs from fraudulent bankruptcy offences and which evidence should be preserved.
Stay informed. New notes from the Brandauer network and current articles are available at brandauer-news.at.
Quick assessment
Which question should be clarified first?
The first reaction depends on the precise allegation.
Already know that you want to send an inquiry? Go directly to the inquiry form.
Which situation fits best?
For section 162 StGB, asset, creditor access, timing and intent must be separated.
All paths at a glance
Overview of all answers.
Prepare file access →
Affected person: secure evidence and define the aim.
Secure documents, messages and witnesses. Then assess whether a complaint, surrender request, seizure application or another procedural step is useful.
Asset movement: check purpose and consideration.
For every asset movement, clarify whether real consideration existed and whether creditor access was obstructed or made harder. Contracts, account statements and handover records should be preserved.
Urgent situation: preserve evidence, do not improvise.
If an appointment, seizure or escalation is imminent, first preserve the current position. Then decide whether a statement, application or contact with the authority is useful.
Elements of frustrating enforcement under section 162 StGB
Elements of frustrating enforcement under section 162 StGB
Section 162 StGB applies where assets are removed from creditor access. The focus is not an isolated booking entry, but the connection with execution, insolvency or a concrete threatened enforcement step.
Typical issues include transfers to related persons, apparent sales, hiding assets or making claims unrecoverable. Criminal relevance depends on timing, knowledge and purpose.
From a lawyer’s perspective, first identify the asset, the threatened access and the economic explanation for the transaction.
Distinction from sections 156 and 159 StGB
Distinction from sections 156 and 159 StGB
Fraudulent bankruptcy offences under section 156 StGB and grossly negligent impairment of creditor interests under section 159 StGB are neighbouring issues. Section 162 StGB focuses more closely on frustrating a concrete enforcement access.
This distinction matters for defence and for complaints. A file may contain several allegations, but each offence must be assessed separately.
Related background is available in the articles on fraudulent bankruptcy and grossly negligent impairment of creditor interests.
Evidence in execution, insolvency and asset transfers
Evidence in execution, insolvency and asset transfers
Important evidence includes contracts, account statements, correspondence, handover records, valuations, seizure documents and timing close to enforcement steps. Internal messages may also explain the purpose of a transaction.
Accused persons should not clean up or destroy records afterwards. Affected creditors should document when they learned of the asset and which access was frustrated.
Economic plausibility is often decisive. A real payment at appropriate value is assessed differently from an apparent transfer without understandable consideration.
First steps when an allegation or suspicion arises
First steps when an allegation or suspicion arises
Accused persons should first seek file access and create a transaction chronology. Dates, participants, value, consideration and reason for each asset movement matter.
Affected persons should specify the enforcement loss. A general suspicion is not enough; the key question is which asset would have been reachable and when.
From a lawyer’s perspective, calm structuring is more useful than a quick explanation. It shows whether criminal law is central or whether a civil enforcement dispute is in the foreground.
Overview
Key review points in practice
Quick assessment
| Point | Meaning | First question |
|---|---|---|
| Asset | item, claim or account | What was reachable? |
| Timing | close to execution or insolvency | When did access threaten? |
| Consideration | economic explanation | Was real value paid? |
| Intent | targeted frustration | What was known? |
Important: Do not explain a transaction afterwards before records, value and access position are structured. An imprecise statement can misstate intent.
Frequently asked questions
Frustrating enforcement under section 162 StGB in execution or insolvency: key questions.
What does frustrating enforcement under section 162 StGB mean? +
It means targeted obstruction or complication of creditor access to assets, especially in the context of execution or insolvency.
Is every asset transfer criminal? +
No. Timing, consideration, access position and intent are decisive. A transaction with a clear business reason is assessed differently.
What should I do first if accused? +
Do not give a spontaneous statement. First prepare file access, transaction records and a precise chronology.
Related topics
You may also be interested in
Topics
section 162 StGBfrustrating enforcementexecutioninsolvencycreditorsbusiness crime
Interview, house search, indictment?
In criminal matters every hour counts. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day, earlier in urgent cases.
Contact
A direct line to the firm.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 660 2407152