Separate advantage from documented expenses.
First clarify whether the allegation is a benefit for organ removal or only reimbursement of specific costs. That distinction is central to draft section 110b.
Draft section 110b on organ trafficking: financial advantage, expense reimbursement, brokering and defence in Austria.
Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
Your lawyer for criminal defence
Criminal proceedings are a matter of trust. One lawyer who walks with you from the first consultation through to the trial, everything from one hand.
Draft section 110b focuses on payments connected with organ removal. For affected persons, the key issue is whether a criminal financial advantage is alleged or whether the payment is justified expense reimbursement.
The draft has not been enacted. It may still matter for internal reviews, communication and preparation where medical processes, brokering or cross-border payments are under scrutiny.
This first assessment is not legal advice. It shows which issues should be separated before a statement or file review.
Already know that you want to send an inquiry? Go directly to the form.
The options separate payment, expenses, involvement and procedural status.
First clarify whether the allegation is a benefit for organ removal or only reimbursement of specific costs. That distinction is central to draft section 110b.
Reimbursement should not be treated automatically as a purchase price. Purpose, amount, records and the link to the medical decision matter.
Draft section 110b is not limited to payments. Brokering, organisation and pressure situations must be assessed through concrete acts and messages.
If proceedings are already underway, any statement should be prepared only after file access. With draft provisions, the exact time of the alleged conduct is especially important.
Draft section 110b is intended to cover financially motivated organ removal and certain brokering activities. The legal focus is not every payment in a medical environment, but whether an organ is removed or brokered for a financial advantage.
The draft excludes certain justified expenses. These may include compensation for real loss or necessary expenses. In practice, that boundary must be supported by documents.
The label used for a payment is not decisive. Purpose, amount, documentation and context matter.
| Situation | Risk | Review |
|---|---|---|
| Payment for an organ | Possible criminal advantage | Secure contracts, communication and payment flow |
| Reimbursement of costs | Potentially justified expenses | Check receipts, lost income and necessity |
| Paid brokering | Possible participation risk | Clarify role, mandate and knowledge |
Bank records, messages, medical documents and role descriptions are often central. A single transfer rarely tells the whole story. The reason for the payment and its timing must be reconstructed.
A person described as broker, relative, adviser or medical contact should define their own contribution early. The legal analysis turns on knowledge, purpose and objective traceability.
Before any statement, the facts should be arranged chronologically.
The existing overview of the 2026 criminal law draft explains the overall proposal. This article focuses only on draft section 110b and the payment boundary. It is not a second general overview.
Until promulgation, the current law remains decisive. The draft can nevertheless show which questions authorities and companies may examine more closely.
Practical point: Anyone confronted with an allegation of unlawful advantage should not give spontaneous explanations about payments. Receipts, purpose and recipient should be organised first.
No. The draft distinguishes criminal financial advantage from certain justified expenses. The concrete payment must still be documented and legally assessed.
No. It is a ministerial draft. In ongoing proceedings, the law in force at the time of the alleged conduct remains decisive.
Transfers, cash receipts, messages, medical documents and a clear chronology of all involved persons are important.
The broader context of the Ministry of Justice draft in a separate overview.
When a company itself may face criminal responsibility.
Remedies under section 87 of the Austrian Code of Criminal Procedure.
In criminal matters every hour counts. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day, earlier in urgent cases.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 660 2407152