Origin and removal path come first.
Under draft section 110c, it must first be clarified whether the organ was unlawfully removed and what records exist. Without that basis, further assessment remains uncertain.
Latest
Draft section 110c: trafficking in or using unlawfully removed organs
Draft section 110c: trafficking, use and evidentiary issues involving unlawfully removed organs in Austria.
Your personal attorney
Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
Your lawyer for criminal defence
Criminal proceedings are a matter of trust. One lawyer who walks with you from the first consultation through to the trial, everything from one hand.
27 June 2026 · Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
Draft section 110c addresses dealings with unlawfully removed organs. The focus is on trafficking, transfer, use and the question who knew about the unlawful removal.
This article focuses only on this part of the 2026 criminal law draft. The general overview remains the starting point and is linked below.
Quick assessment
Draft section 110c: trafficking in or using unlawfully removed organs
This first assessment is not legal advice. It shows which issues should be separated before a statement or file review.
Already know that you want to send an inquiry? Go directly to the form.
Which section 110c issue matches your situation?
The options separate origin, use, role and procedural status.
All paths at a glance
Overview of all answers.
Review origin and documents →
Clarify use and control.
The assessment depends on who had access, who initiated a transfer and what was known about the removal circumstances at the time.
Separate function from decision-making power.
Contact with documents or processes is not automatically criminal participation. Decision-making power, knowledge and concrete contribution matter.
Prioritise file access and preservation of evidence.
When an investigation is active, records should be preserved but no spontaneous account should be given. First clarify which concrete use is alleged.
What the draft makes relevant for review
What the draft makes relevant for review
The draft has not been enacted. It can still matter in existing files because it shows which offences and jurisdictional issues may be regulated more precisely.
For legal assessment, the headline of the draft is not decisive. The concrete facts matter: who did what, when did it happen, what role did the person have and what Austrian link is alleged?
Review
Review points in proceedings
The first analysis should keep the legal layers separate.
| Layer | Überblick question | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| Timing | Which law applied at the relevant time? | Secure chronology and file status |
| Contribution | What concrete conduct is alleged? | Assess role and communication |
| Jurisdiction | Why should Austrian authorities be competent? | Check place of conduct and Austrian link |
Which documents now matter
Which documents now matter
File notes, messages, contracts, travel data, medical or organisational documents and an exact timeline may be important. Without chronology, draft law, current law and the actual allegation become blurred.
Before making a statement, affected persons should check whether the allegation is covered by current law at all and whether the draft is mentioned only as background.
Process
From allegation to reliable assessment
The right sequence avoids premature legal conclusions.
- undefinedundefined
Read the allegation
- undefinedundefined
Clarify timing
- undefinedundefined
Organise records
- undefinedundefined
Plan response
Distinction from the existing overview
Distinction from the existing overview
The existing article on the 2026 criminal law draft explains the reform as a whole. This article deals only with the specific issue named here and deliberately avoids a second general overview.
Even with current reform topics, there is no criminal liability without a legal basis. Until promulgation, current law remains the starting point for every defence analysis.
Practical point: In reform-related cases, every statement should clearly distinguish current law from proposed law. That distinction is often more important than the political headline.
FAQ
What affected persons should know about the draft
Is the 2026 draft already in force? +
No. It is a draft. Until entry into force, current law remains decisive.
Why can a draft still matter? +
It may show which questions authorities, companies or participants will examine more closely. In ongoing cases, it does not replace current law.
What should be checked before making a statement? +
Timing, concrete contribution, jurisdiction, evidence and the question whether current law covers the allegation should be reviewed.
Related topics
You may also find this useful
Overview of the 2026 criminal law draft
The broader context of the Ministry of Justice draft in a separate overview.
Corporate criminal liability in Austria
When a company itself may face criminal responsibility.
Appeal against court orders
Remedies under section 87 of the Austrian Code of Criminal Procedure.
Topics
organ-traffickingsection-110caustriaevidenceusedefence
Interview, house search, indictment?
In criminal matters every hour counts. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day, earlier in urgent cases.
Contact
A direct line to the firm.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 660 2407152