Accused person: clarify allegation and file first.
Do not give a spontaneous explanation before the allegation, file position and evidence are known. From a lawyer’s perspective, defence starts with file access and a reliable chronology.
White-collar crime
Environmental criminal law in business: water pollution, waste and responsibility
Environmental criminal law in Austrian business: water pollution, waste, responsible persons and first defence steps after investigations.
Your personal attorney
Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
Your lawyer for criminal defence
Criminal proceedings are a matter of trust. One lawyer who walks with you from the first consultation through to the trial, everything from one hand.
26 August 2026 · Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
An environmental allegation in a business often starts with a concrete event: wastewater, stored waste, construction material or an official inspection report. Criminal law is not about every environmental problem, but about a suspected offence under the environmental provisions of the StGB.
This article explains from a lawyer’s perspective how responsible persons in a business should react after an incident, which evidence matters and why internal roles must be separated from criminal responsibility.
Stay informed. New notes from the Brandauer network and current articles are available at brandauer-news.at.
Quick assessment
Which question should be clarified first?
The first reaction depends on whether there is already a summons, a seizure or only an initial suspicion.
Already know that you want to send an inquiry? Go directly to the inquiry form.
Which situation fits best?
This assessment does not replace file access. It only helps to sort the first step.
All paths at a glance
Overview of all answers.
Prepare file access →
Business role: do not accept responsibility too early.
In a business, technical access, management responsibility and actual decision making may be separate. Roles, approvals and documentation routes must be reviewed separately.
Evidence: preserve original state and records.
If data, devices or documents have already been secured, records, copies, timing and scope matter. Only then can a remedy or statement be assessed.
Urgent situation: take the appointment seriously and stay calm.
A summons or official deadline is not a reason for improvised explanations. First check status, addressee and legal consequence of the letter.
When environmental criminal law becomes relevant
When environmental criminal law becomes relevant
Environmental offences in the StGB concern specific risks or harm to water, soil, air, animals or plants. The first step is to identify the precise offence alleged.
Water pollution, waste storage and improper handling of dangerous substances may become criminally relevant if the statutory requirements are met. An organisational mistake alone is not a conviction.
From a lawyer’s perspective, the review starts with time of event, installation, substances, responsibilities and official documentation.
Separate responsible persons and business roles
Separate responsible persons and business roles
Management, operations, environmental officers, project leaders and employees may all be involved in different ways. Criminal responsibility does not automatically follow from a job title.
The key questions are who decided what, who had technical control and who knew or had to know about a risk. Approvals and records matter especially on construction sites, storage areas and wastewater systems.
An early internal review should stay factual. Correcting documents afterwards can create more risk than clarity.
Preserve evidence after an incident, inspection or complaint
Preserve evidence after an incident, inspection or complaint
Important evidence includes measurements, photographs, maintenance records, disposal documents, delivery notes, shift plans and internal notifications. Official correspondence and notices should also be kept complete.
If police, authority or prosecutor request documents, the scope should be documented precisely. Our article on seizure and confiscation explains general procedural questions.
During a search, calm conduct matters. A statement before measurements and documents are ordered can create unnecessary commitments.
Defence strategy in business environmental cases
Defence strategy in business environmental cases
Defence must separate technical cause, legal threshold and personal responsibility. Often the overall picture of permit, maintenance, organisation and incident is decisive.
If a company is involved, corporate liability may also arise. This article focuses on the criminal allegation against specific persons and the first procedural steps.
A structured chronology with evidence is useful. Then it can be decided whether a statement, evidence motion or silence is appropriate.
Overview
Key review points after an environmental allegation
Quick assessment
| Point | Meaning | First question |
|---|---|---|
| Incident | concrete trigger | What happened when? |
| Substances | water, waste or dangerous material | Which substance is involved? |
| Role | business responsibility | Who could decide? |
| Evidence | measurements and records | What is preserved? |
Important: Do not clean up, delete or rewrite documents. Preserve the original state first and then obtain legal review.
Frequently asked questions
Environmental criminal law in business: key questions.
Is every environmental violation in a business criminal? +
No. Criminal liability requires a specific offence, the required risk or harm and personal responsibility.
Who is responsible for water pollution? +
That depends on decision making, responsibility, knowledge and technical control. The business title alone is not decisive.
What should be preserved first after an inspection? +
Measurements, photos, records, disposal documents, notices and internal responsibilities should be kept unchanged.
Topics
environmental criminal lawwater pollutionwastebusinessStGBseizure
Interview, house search, indictment?
In criminal matters every hour counts. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day, earlier in urgent cases.
Contact
A direct line to the firm.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 660 2407152